1. Throughout the episode there is a mild linear naritive, however there are also some multi strand narritives which all relate to the main narritive of the murder.
Different famlies and people are somehow involved in the murder, icluding the suspect which the episode revolves around as he becomes homeless.
2. The protaginist (Jake) is presented as an accuseed, vunerable and innocent person. Audience will sympathise for him.
His role is communicated, since starting the episode being interrigated and then later portrayed as the innocent guy, who is a good person with a good heart- however people think otherwise.
Subsequently audience will not sympathise for the teenage boy who has become a homeless, robbing middle-aged women.
3. From the start of the episode the action code of the past, appears in speech, about the murder. And the interrigations for the murder are held throughout the episode.
There is another action code when the homeless teenage boy robs the middle-aged women by snatching her purse as he pushes her to the ground.
4. Through the episode their is a major enigma of ''who did it''. The audience can easily work out who actually murdered, but the audience can also second guess there thoughts about it and re ask themselves if the homeless teenage boy actually did it.
5. Equilbirium
The murder interrigation is being delt and the teenage suspect runs away from home and becomes homeless, sitting in a park bench with a friend.
Disequilibrium
The homeless teenage boy becomes desperate for some food as he starves without money. This leads to him robbing a women for her purse.
The other suspect (Jake) of the murder, is seen to be depressed about how all his family and friends had turned on him and wont forgive, apart from his mother.
New equilibrium
The homeless teenage boy make a new friend, while jake is told by Dr Sanders that he is to be soon released, and his mother will accept him back home.
